Search Journal-type in search term and press enter
Social Media-Follow Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care on Facebook and Twitter
« September 2013 Banner Good Samaritan / Phoenix VA Critical Care Journal Club | Main | August 2013 Critical Care Journal Club: Less is More »
Friday
Sep202013

September 2013 Tucson Critical Care Journal Club: Early Tracheostomy

Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K for the TracMan Collaborators. Effect of Early vs Late Tracheostomy Placement on Survival in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: The TracMan Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2013;309(20):2121-29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]  

Tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure in the critical care unit; however, the most appropriate time to perform the procedure remains uncertain.  Rumbak et. al. (1) demonstrated a 50% reduction in mortality in 2004 when tracheostomy was performed within the first 2 days of intubation compared to day 14 to 16. This study was sponsored by the University of Oxford with funding provided by the UK Intensive Care Society and the Medical Research Council to evaluate potential benefits associated with early tracheostomy in a larger patient population.  Patients from 72 different UK critical care centers were randomized to early tracheostomy (within the first 4 days) or late tracheostomy (after day 10 if still clinically indicated).

Between November 2004 and November 2008, 909 patients were randomized with 2 years of follow-up data available (January 2011).  Inclusion and exclusion criteria were relatively straightforward.  Patients were included if a senior physician believed they were likely to require another 7 days of intubation.  Patients were excluded if they required immediate, life-saving tracheostomy; tracheostomy was contraindicated for anatomical or other reasons; or if respiratory failure was due to chronic neurological disease.  The primary outcome was all cause mortality 30 days post-randomization.  Secondary outcomes included mortality at discharge from the critical care unit, from the hospital, 1 year post randomization, and 2 year post randomization, duration of critical care and hospital stay, days of intravenous sedative administration, and antimicrobial free days in the critical care.  The authors had planned a sample size of 1692 patients to detect a 6.3% absolute reduction in mortality with 80% power but because of declining recruitment, the final study had an 80% power to detect an 8.3% absolute reduction in mortality.

The results demonstrated no statistical difference between the two study groups in the primary outcome and most of the secondary outcomes.  The only significant finding was patients in the early tracheostomy group received less days of intravenous sedation.  Among the late tracheostomy group, 53.7% of the patients never had tracheostomy performed because they had been discharged from the critical care unit or no longer required mechanical ventilation.  The primary outcome of this study agrees with many recently published smaller randomized controlled trials which showed early versus late tracheostomy provided no improvement in mortality (2-5).

In conclusion, this study suggests that a “wait and see” approach to tracheostomy is justified in the majority of patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring mechanical ventilation.  It is not clear why the earlier Rumbak (1) study yielded such a strong signal for reduced mortality with early tracheostomy.  It is possible that ventilation devices and management strategies have improved since the original study period, thereby, reducing harms associated with prolonged translaryngeal intubation.

Wendy Hsu, MD; Pulmonary Fellow1

Joe Gerald, MD PhD; Assistant Professor2

1Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine

2College of Public Health

University of Arizona

Tucson, AZ

References

  1. Rumbak MJ, Newton M, Truncale T, Schwartz SW, Adams JW, Hazard PB. A prospective, randomized study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(8):1689-94. [CrossRef] [PubMed]  
  2. Koch T, Hecker B, Hecker A, Brenck F, et al. Early tracheostomy decreases ventilation time but has no impact on mortality of intensive care patients: a randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(6):1001-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]  
  3. Zheng Y, Sui F, Chen XK, Zhang GC, et al. Early versus late percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients anticipated requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chinese Medical Journal (Engl). 2012;125(11):1925-30.
  4. Blot F, Similowski T, Trouillet JL, Chardon P, et al. Early tracheotomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in unselected severely ill ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(10):1779-87. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 
  5. Terragni PP, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, et al. Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(15):1483-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

Reference as: Hsu W, Gerald J. September 2013 Tucson critical care journal club: early tracheostomy. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2013;7(3):194-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc129-13 PDF

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>