Search Journal-type in search term and press enter
In Memoriam
Social Media-Follow Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care on Facebook and Twitter
« Patient Safety Outcomes under Flexible and Standard Resident Duty-Hour Rules and Sleep and Alertness in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine | Main | Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure-Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free from Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial »
Monday
Feb252019

Factors Associated with High-Quality Guidelines for the Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Diseases in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

Molino CGRC, Leite-Santos NC, Gabriel FC, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 18. [Epub ahead of print] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

The authors assessed 421 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in primary care using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument, version II (AGREE-II) tool. A multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with quality of CPGs. Of the CPGs reviewed only 23.5% (99) were classified as high quality. Factors associated with high-quality CPGs included having more than 20 authors (odds ratio, 9.08; 95%CI, 3.35-24.62), development at governmental institutions (odds ratio, 10.38; 95%CI, 2.72-39.60), and reporting funding (odds ratio, 10.34; 95%CI, 4.77-22.39). Year of publication, region, guideline version, and scope were not associated with quality among included CPGs. An accompanying editorial discusses the implications of the study and argues that only high quality guidelines should be implemented. The study agrees with previous publications examining the quality of non-primary care guidelines including the Infectious Disease Society of America and American Thoracic Society by Lee et al. in 2011 and several publications in the SWJPCC examining ICU guidelines.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>