Medical Image of the Week: Left Ventricular Non-compaction

Figure 1. Cardiac MRI showing severely enlarged and remodeled left ventricle (LV) and moderately enlarged right ventricle (RV) with severe global hypokinesis and akinesis of the interventricular septum. Significant trabeculation was noted in the apical, antero-lateral and anterior segments of the LV (red arrows), consistent with LV non-compaction.

A 38-year-old woman with history of type 2diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented to emergency department with worsening exertional dyspnea and orthopnea for the past 2-3 months. She also reported a 14 pound weight gain within the 2 weeks prior to presentation. She denied any prior history of cardiac or pulmonary disease. Also, there was no family history of heart disease. She denies any recent sick contacts, smoking, alcohol drinking, or substance abuse.

Physical exam revealed jugular venous pressure of 10 cm H₂O and significant bilateral lower extremity pitting edema. Chest x-ray showed an enlarged cardiac silhouette. Brain naturetic peptide (BNP) was 2,917 pg/mL. A subsequent echocardiogram revealed a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 23% with severe global LV hypokinesia with moderate mitral regurgitation. Thyroid panel as well as iron panel were within normal range. Other laboratories were unremarkable. For the new onset systolic heart failure, a coronary angiography was performed, which demonstrated normal coronary arteries. The patient was diagnosed with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and underwent a cardiac MRI, which showed severely enlarged and remodeled LV and moderately enlarged right ventricle (RV) with severe global hypokinesis and akinesis of the intraventricular septum. Moreover, a significant trabeculation was noted in the apical, antero-lateral and anterior segments of the left ventricle (Figure 1), consistent with “LV non-compaction” without any evidence of LV thrombus. The patient was started on diuretics and safely discharged with significant symptoms improvement.  

LV non-compaction is a cardiomyopathy characterized by altered myocardial wall with prominent left ventricular trabeculae and deep intertrabecular recesses (1). Some authors believe that non-compaction of the ventricular myocardium results from abnormal persistence of the trabecular layer  while others believe that altered regulation in cell proliferation, differentiation, and maturation during ventricular wall formation, resulting in hyper-trabeculation (2). Its prevalence in the general population is unknown but among patients undergoing echocardiography is estimated at 0.014 to 1.3 percent. In patients with heart failure, its prevalence has been reported as 3 to 4 percent (3). Patients with LV non-compaction may present with heart failure, arrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, syncope, and thromboembolic events. The diagnosis is usually established by transthoracic echocardiography. When echocardiography is indeterminate, cardiac MRI, computed tomography, or left ventriculography could be an alternative diagnostic modality. Data on treatment of LV non-compaction are limited, and there is no standard therapy established for this condition. Medical management depends on the clinical manifestations, LV ejection fraction, presence of arrhythmias, and risk of thromboembolism.

Rostam Khoubyari MD^1,2 and Seongseok Yun MD PhD³

¹Department of Cardiology, ²Sarver Heart Center; and the ³Department of Medicine, University of Arizona

Tucson, AZ USA

References

1. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2006 Apr 11;113(14):1807-16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Henderson DJ, Anderson RH. The development and structure of the ventricles in the human heart. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009 Jul;30(5):588-96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Kovacevic-Preradovic T, Jenni R, Oechslin EN, Noll G, Seifert B, Attenhofer Jost CH. Isolated left ventricular noncompaction as a cause for heart failure and heart transplantation: a single center experience. Cardiology. 2009;112(2):158-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cite as: Khoubyari R, Yun S. Medical Image of the week: left ventricular non-compaction. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2016;12(6):229-30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc036-16 PDF

June 2016 Imaging Case of the Month

Michael B. Gotway, MD

Department of Radiology

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ USA

Imaging Case of the Month CME Information  

Members of the Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and California Thoracic Societies and the Mayo Clinic are able to receive  0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Completion of an evaluation form is required to receive credit and a link is provided on the last panel of the activity.

0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

Estimated time to complete this activity: 0.25 hours

Lead Author(s): Michael B. Gotway, MD. All Faculty, CME Planning Committee Members, and the CME Office Reviewers have disclosed that they do not have any relevant financial relationships with commercial interests that would constitute a conflict of interest concerning this CME activity. 

Learning Objectives:
As a result of this activity I will be better able to:    

1. Correctly interpret and identify clinical practices supported by the highest quality available evidence.
2. Will be better able to establsh the optimal evaluation leading to a correct diagnosis for patients with pulmonary, critical care and sleep disorders.
3. Will improve the translation of the most current clinical information into the delivery of high quality care for patients.
4. Will integrate new treatment options in discussing available treatment alternatives for patients with pulmonary, critical care and sleep related disorders.

Learning Format: Case-based, interactive online course, including mandatory assessment questions (number of questions varies by case). Please also read the Technical Requirements.

CME Sponsor: University of Arizona College of Medicine at the Arizona Health Sciences Center.

Current Approval Period: January 1, 2015-December 31, 2016

Financial Support Received: None.

Clinical History: A 65-year-old non-smoking man with a past medical history significant only for dyslipidemia and hypertension presented to the emergency room with a 2-week complaint of intermittent, diffuse, high back pain accompanied by sweating and nausea and non-bloody emesis. The back pain does not radiate. The patient also notes that recently he has suffered from pronounced fatigue and some shortness of breath; until recently he had been an endurance athlete.

Physical Examination: Physical examination was normal; in particular, the back pain was not reproducible on palpation. The patient was afebrile.

Laboratory: Laboratory data were remarkable for a mildly elevated white blood cell count of 11 x 10⁹ cells/L. Serum chemistries were within normal limits and cardiac troponins were negative. Oxygen saturation on room air was 94%.

Radiography: Frontal and lateral chest radiography (Figure 1) was performed.

Figure 1. Frontal (A) and lateral (B) chest radiography

 Which of the following statements regarding the chest radiograph is most accurate? (Click on the correct answer to proceed to the second of eight panels)

1. The frontal chest radiograph shows a large left pleural effusion
2. The frontal chest radiograph shows an abnormally widened mediastinum
3. The frontal chest radiograph shows multifocal consolidation
4. The frontal chest radiograph shows no significant findings
5. The frontal chest radiograph shows numerous small lung nodules

Cite as: Gotway MB. June 2016 imaging case of the month. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2016 Jun;12(6):216-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc047-16 PDF