Correct!
1. Intra-atrial right to left shunting

She had an echocardiogram performed (Image shown), which revealed a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and significant right to left shunting Figure 2).

Figure 2. Apical four-chamber view: saline micro-bubbles filling the right atrium and right ventricle with dense opacification of the left atrium within one cardiac cycle (red arrow), confirming severe right to left shunt at the atrial level. In the case of a pulmonary arterial-venous malformation, the appearance of bubbles is more gradual, and is often seen within the pulmonary veins. In a normal bubble study, three or less microbubbles pass into the left side of the heart.

She was referred to an interventional cardiologist to discuss the option of percutaneous closure of PFO. In view of successful anticoagulation, after explanation of risks and benefits, the patient deferred the procedure.
Foramen ovale is a flap-like valve at the atrial septum, which allows shunting from the right atrium to the left atrium and bypassing the uninflated lungs in the fetus.  Changes in left atrial pressures after birth close the flap.  The foramen ovale remains patent in approximately 25% of adults and can, under certain circumstances, allow right to left shunting at the atrial level (1).  Although most adults with a PFO are asymptomatic, an increased incidence of PFO in patients with a stroke has been documented.  The optimal treatment of PFO in the context of a cryptogenic stroke remains undetermined. Possible treatment options include medical, systemic anticoagulation, and closure of the PFO with one of the several available percutaneous devices at catheterization (2).

Although none of the recently published randomized controlled trials, RESPECT (3), CLOSURE 1 (4), PC Trial (5) have shown differences between medical and device-closure treatments, it has been proposed that high risk individuals undergo percutaneous device-closure of the PFO. Characteristics of high risk individuals include: less than 55 years of age, known circulating pro-coagulant, and PFO anatomy that could predispose to neurological events such as a large PFO, large right to left shunt, highly mobile PFO valve and presence of atrial septal aneurysm (6). Our patient highlights the importance of individualized treatment and the need for detailed discussion of the risks and benefits of each treatment option in complex situations.

Bhupinder Natt M.D., Linda Snyder, M.D. and Daniela Lax, M.D.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine
Division of Pediatric Cardiology
University of Arizona Medical Center
Tucson, AZ

References

  1. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1984;59:17–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. O'Gara PT, Messe SR, Tuzcu EM, et al. Percutaneous Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Call for Completion of Randomized Clinical Trials: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this science advisory. Circulation. 2009;119:2743-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 
  3. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, et al. for the RESPECT Investigators. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Eng J Med 2013;368:1092-1100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 
  4. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al for the CLOSURE I Investigators. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Eng J Med 2012;366:991-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 
  5. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, et al for the PC Trial Investigators. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1083-91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 
  6. Landzberg MJ and Khairy P. Indications for the closure of patent foramen ovale. Heart. 2004;90(2):219–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Home/Critical Care